His Excellency
is one of those films that is difficult to love, partly because it often fails
to deliver a coherent experience or meaning: it has moments of jingoism and
anti-foreigner attitudes that feel alien to a 21st century audience,
yet also goes to great pains to mock the British patriarchal attitude to ‘the
colonies’; it mocks socialism yet offers a partial celebration of unionism and
collective action; ridicules military might but ultimately relies on it to
resolve narrative issues; celebrates a particular ‘northern’ personality within
Britain but dilutes that through the imposition of upper class knowledge and
restraint. And, worst of all for some critics, it is not the darkly wry and
subversively witty film that Robert Hamer, director of Kind Hearts and Coronets (1949), was expected to deliver.
However, for all of the above reasons, the film is never
less than fascinating, not least when it is imploding under the weight of its
own narrative devices and themes.
From the opening announcement it is clear the film has a
political and satirical point to make: ‘Great Britain’s Colonies are known to
be the outposts of her Empire. They are reputed also to be the outposts of
dressing for dinner, reading “The Times”, cricket and afternoon tea... This
film tells of a mythical Colony of this kind during Britain’s recent Labour
regime.’ That statement is a clue to the balancing act of mockery and
patriotism the narrative tries to accomplish. In the colony (and naval base) of
Artisa, the existing governor is replaced after a worker’s strike and dockyard
riot. Instead of reliable aristocratic candidate Sir James Kirkman (Cecil
Parker), Britain installs northern trade union leader George Harrison (Eric
Portman). A man of action rather than a diplomat, Harrison rejects much of
Kirkman’s advice and tries to change working conditions for the Arista dockyard
workers, leading to a confrontation with Arista’s corrupt Prime Minister
(Gerard Heinz) and local union leader Morellos (Geoffrey Keen). As the military
are called out to deal with another strike and riot, Harrison relies on a final
speech to try and get the workers on his side and back to work.
The class and political conflict is clear from the
opening words and dialogue. One of the film’s representations of colonial
‘Britishness’ is a group of old ladies who gather at ‘Ye Olde Tea Shoppe’, read
The Times and discuss the latest
developments in London society. It is one of these ladies who declares, upon
hearing of Harrison’s appointment, ‘I suppose with this wretched government one
had to expect a Socialist, but they might at least have sent us one of the
right sort’ (i.e. a socialist from the right background) It is tempting to
compare this old-fashioned and fusty version of Britain with a similar
gathering of old ladies in The
Ladykillers (1955) three years later. In both cases, it is possible to read
the gatherings as a clash of modernity, tradition and party politics – if the The Ladykillers (as director Mackendrick
claimed) was about the Edwardian anachronism of Mrs Wilberforce (and her
gloriously skewed house), then His
Excellency signals the Victorian/Edwardian colonial mindset is equally
anachronistic. If The Ladykillers can
be read as a veiled comment on the post-war political landscape (as suggested
by Jeffrey Richards and Anthony Aldgate), His Excellency offers a
more explicit intervention in such debates.
Ealing’s politics and productions were class-ridden, but
the content of their films can also be seen as driven by a reformer’s zeal, an
often middle class exploration of modern society and different areas of Britain
and abroad. While much of its representation of Britain here is aristocratic or
militaristic, Harrison and his daughter Peggy (Susan Stephen) are the voices of
the sensible middle classes, mediators that can attempt to talk to both sides
and reach a compromise. This is hardly the socialism rejected in the line of
dialogue quoted above, but it is a return to wartime values of compromise and
coalition (Harrison accepts the need for Kirkman’s upper class help, Kirkman
accepts Harrison’s perspective is valid). These are elements and ideals that Ealing
understood, given Balcon’s description of their ‘mild revolution’ when many of
them supported the post-war Labour government. However, the other side of this
exploration of Britishness abroad means the film gives little voice to the
natives of Arista, who are broadly scheming or in the pocket of large
corporations. The local police chief Dobrieda (Eric Pohlmann), for example, is
a caricature, a pompous colourful peacock of a figure that struts around the
film like a bad Mussolini impersonator.
Harrison, as the film’s patriarch, believes he can walk
the streets of his capital city until he understands the living conditions of
his new people and find a solution (notably he never visits the tea shoppe, but
prefers local bars). He may still hark back to his working class roots (Portman
has a striking Manchester accent throughout), but it is clear from Peggy’s
attitudes and accent that theirs is now a middle class life. Harrison, however,
does succeed in wrestling sense from both upper and working class perspectives
though his language alone – he attends a meeting of striking workers and
convinces them to return to work through his oratory alone, while Kirkman and
others are browbeaten by his ideas and orders. Where military might failed,
working class language and logic triumph.
As might be imagined, this story offers little feminine
perspective beyond the old ladies in the tea shoppe. Lady Kirkman (Helen
Cherry) makes snide comments about the Harrisons, but is won over by Peggy’s
charm and approach to running the governor’s palace; yet this is hardly a
celebration of Peggy, who is reduced to a housewife’s role, chastising the chef
and giving speeches to the local Red Cross. Stephen gives a solid, light
performance but has little role beyond a sounding board for Portman to test
rhetoric on.
Given the incoherent nature of much of the film, there
are elements that can be celebrated: Portman and Parker give committed and
enjoyable performances, the opulent set design of the palace is well used
throughout (there are several shots of Harrison, Kirkman and Admiral Barclay
(Edward Chapman) arranged across those spaces, like chess pieces on the
chequered floor beneath them), and it continues Ealing’s strong tradition of location
filming (the images of Portman striding
through the streets and alleys of Arista, lingering in the empty town square,
or yelling at the dockyard add colour to the story). Indeed, in places, the
film is crying out for actual colour – Technicolor or Eastmancolour – and it is
a shame it wasn’t made two years later, when the studio embraced colour
filmmaking.
[UPDATED April 2014: His Excellency is available as part of The Ealing Studios Rarities Collection, Volume 10, from Network]
Next time, we go (almost) back to the start, with the second film after Michael Balcon took over, The Ware Case (1938)...
The trouble is that "the recent Labour regime" is not delivered at all in a tongue-in-cheek, self-mocking way. As far as the film's authors are concerned, it WAS a 'regime', with all the illegitimacy that implies, rather than a properly elected democratic government!
ReplyDelete