‘based... on a factual story taken from the newspapers.
Part of its appeal for me was that it was about the mother-child relationship...
which, I recognise, was a recurring one in Ealing films.’ (Michael Balcon,
quoted in Barr, 192-3)
The idea that the mother-child relationship was a
recurring one in Ealing might seem a strange observation, even coming from the
man who ran the studio between 1938 and 1959. Maternal issues can, of course,
be found across a range of Ealing’s films: there is the mother-battleaxe figure
who has to be defeated (often by the new bride) in films like Young Man’s Fancy (1939) and Turned Out Nice Again (1944), and there
are mother-child elements to Cage of Gold
(1950), Where No Vultures Fly (1951)
and Mandy (1952), but it seems a
stretch to call this a recurring theme. Children are more visible in Hue and Cry (1947) and The Magnet (1950), but the mother-child theme
is less evident; equally, an argument could be made that father-son (The Long Arm, 1956; Pink String and Sealing Wax, 1945) and father-daughter
relationships (Lease of Life, 1954; Touch and Go, 1955, The Shiralee, 1957) are equally important to the studio output.
The focus of The
Divided Heart can, however, be seen as a continuation of Ealing’s move into
more domestic melodramas from the post-war period, a move that paralleled what
Charles Barr and others have seen as a move towards the professional male
figure of The Cruel Sea (1953) and The Man in the Sky (1957). Barr also saw
this film as ‘worthy but tame – sober, academic, actressy, afraid of getting
into any deep emotional water’ (192): an assessment that seems to ignore the
film’s desire to elicit emotion in quite direct and manipulative ways. It is
also very much (to use a potentially problematic term) a ‘woman’s film’, in
that the subject matter appears tailored for an assumed female audience – and
the film features two central female characters.
The film opens with Inga and Franz Hartl (Cornell
Borchers and Armin Dahlen), on the Bavarian ski-slopes and at the birthday
party of their son Toni (Michael Ray / Martin Keller). The party is disturbed
by two child repatriation officers, notably Marks (Geoffrey Keen), who informs
the Hartl’s that Toni’s biological mother is alive and living in Slovenia.
During a court case to assess Toni’s future, and to decide which of his mothers
he should end up with, there are flashbacks that fill out other elements of the
story: the birth mother, Sonja Slavko (Yvonne Mitchell) was held in a
concentration camp during the war, and lost her husband and daughters; after
finding Toni at a German orphanage, Inga raised him by herself while Franz is
away at war, and captured by the Russians. Toni (or Ivan) gets the chance to
meet Sonja, and grows to like her, but tells the judges he would prefer to live
with the Hartls. Sonja also comes round to the belief that Toni would be better
with them. Despite this, the three American justices vote 2-1 in favour of
returning him to Sonja, and the final image is mother and son, reunited, on a
train heading home.
The film is richer and more complex than Barr’s
assessment allows, not least because it is, like Frieda (1947) before it, a commentary from an English perspective,
on the post-war German character and identity. At first, the Hartl’s are just a
nice family, but as the flashbacks reveal, Franz was a Nazi soldier and Sonja
(and other Slovenians) suffered at the hands of the German army. The symbolism
and emotion is laid on fairly thick: Toni/Ivan has hysterics every time he sees
a Nazi uniform because it (unconsciously) reminds him of being torn from Sonja;
in court, Sonja speaks through a translator, but one word ‘Auschwitz’ echoes
round the courtroom and is understood in all languages; there is a concern
about whether the Hartl’s will tell Toni the truth about German actions in the
war, particularly against Slovenia. Those moments aside, the film rarely takes
a direct position for or against Inga, and Borchers gets her fair share of
lingering close-ups when she talks about her love for Toni, or longing looks
across the courtroom at her competitor for his love, Sonja.
It could be argued that Inga gets more than her fair
share of the film’s portrayal of this custody case, not least because she
speaks English throughout (although, in one of those cases of glorious movie
logic, she is actually speaking German), while Sonja – to start with at least –
has to speak through a male translator, thus striking her mute for at least
half the film. Mitchell makes the most of her mostly silent role and, like Borchers,
is given plenty of time for expressive looks and glances – one of the places
where the film wades happily into the ‘deep emotional waters’ Barr thinks it
incapable of. By the end of the film, when Toni/Ivan has saved Sonja from a
snowball attack in his home village, and both mothers have mutely expressed
their love, the film is an exercise in manipulative staging, framing and
editing. (there are also several nicely composed shots that fir both women into
the frame, often with Inga in close-up, Sonja further away, and arguably more
distant emotionally) That it ends with clumsy speeches from the three judges
giving their opinions is unfortunate, because it shifts the focus from the two
actresses who have driven it along so far.
The film is solid throughout, and makes good use of its
location work in St. Johann-in-Tirol and Skofja Loka (Yugoslavia), adding a
European sheen and a set of different spaces to the tale. Indeed, the Bavarian
setting (and much of the story) seems so alien to much of what Ealing was known
for – despite Balcon’s claim – that when Sonja gets lost in the streets and
alleys of the village, our sympathy as an audience may shift to her, because
this is unfamiliar territory for the Ealing audience as well.
[UPDATED April 2014: The Divided Heart is now available as part of The Ealing Studios Rarities Collection, Volume 10, from Network]
Next time, more Ealing European themes in His Excellency (1952)...
No comments:
Post a Comment