If Where No Vultures
Fly (1951) was an attempt to combine documentary, travelogue, action-adventure
and colour filmmaking, then West of
Zanzibar slims that concoction down by losing most of the documentary
approach and focusing on the colonial action-adventure, personified here by
stalwart hero Bob Payton (again played by Anthony Steel). The change in emphasis can also be seen in the accompanying poster, with its pirate ships and action scenes.
Like many sequels,
this provides audiences with known pleasures – shots of elephants, giraffe,
warthogs, rhino and impala – and expanded ones – mainly images of crocodiles
and birds; where Payton largely ruled his small fiefdom in the first film, here
he is striking out to the Kenyan port of Mombasa and to the island of Zanzibar;
rather than simply the adventurous do-gooder, here Payton is an unlikely
detective and adventurer taking on gangsters as well as poachers; and, if the
first film largely dramatised white issues, the sequel is a more direct attempt
to give the black African characters a voice, a perspective, and a range of
psychologised characters and roles within the story. Yet the price for this
latter development is the more stereotypical role played by the largely
villainous Arab sailors and traders who exploit the African tribes.
The film’s shift from the savannahs of the Kenyan game
reserve to wider concerns is evident from the opening images of old-fashioned
dhows slicing through the deep blue waves of the sea. Over this, a voiceover
talks about the dhows of Arabia, the trade routes, the ‘black gold’ of slavery
and the ‘white gold’ of ivory that many such ships engage with. At this stage,
the feel remains documentary, but that shifts to a more dramatic mode as the
action moves to the Galanas tribe who are voting on where to move their village
– the safety of the hills or the ‘civilisation’ offered along the coast. Payton
is here, advising tribal chief Ushingo (Edric Connor) to (quite literally) head
for the hills: but the younger generation, including Ushingo’s sons Bethlehem
(Bethlehem Sketch) and Ambrose (David Osielti), are drawn by the opportunities
in Mombasa. Ushingo is the only person to vote for the hills.
Five minutes into the film, then, it is clear that West of Zanzibar has a different view on
its black characters: there are a range of individuals, they are identified by
name, and there is an attempt to draw the audience in to their problems. Payton
remains the voice of moral certainty, however: when he speaks against Mombasa,
it is clear the tribe has made the wrong choice. But when Payton goes back to
the game reserve, the camera stays with the tribe, showing us hut building and
food preparation in their new coastal setting, and the problems of selling food
at the local markets. Before you know it, several young hunters (including
Ushingo’s sons) have met Arab men (signalled by bright red fezzes), been lured
in by the dangers of consumerism (and thus, away from their traditions), and
are back in the reserve, hunting elephants for ivory. Ushingo tells Payton his
people have contracted a ‘sickness’ (desire for money and goods) are ‘simple in
the ways of the towns’ and ‘starve in the slums’ – he also challenges Payton’s
attempts to help, noting ‘It is always an African who pays... when we yield to
temptation, we are always savages.’ This representation of a non-white voice
also offers at least a partial challenge to the pro-white civilisation
suggested by Payton in the earlier film.
Like Mannering in Where
No Vultures Fly, there is a central character whose official public persona
masks a villainous ivory smuggler: lawyer Dhofar (Martin Benson) protects the
interests of the dhow captain accused of ivory smuggling by Payton, and
educates the Payton’s in ‘real world’ politics, accusing them of being no
better than missionaries, and comparing the plight of African tribes in slums
to the British working classes during the Industrial Revolution. While an educated
man, Dhofar’ intelligence (like Mannering’s before him) is no match for
Payton’s moral certainty and action-hero credentials: a swift punch to the jaw
is Payton’s ultimate riposte to the mannered Arab lawyer.
Payton’s attempts to help Ushingo are aided by his wife Mary
(played here by Sheila Sim) and M’Kwongi (Orlando Martins), and include
haphazard investigations around Zanzibar, boat chases across the ocean, and
gathering help from the Kenyan tribes to track and attack the ivory-smuggling
dhow (which, conveniently, has Dhofar on board). Despite the presence here of
debates around the future of Africa, tribal issues and at least a hint of the
African perspective, this is action-adventure to the core, where problems are
solved by a no-nonsense white man, who regularly strips to the waist, gets into
scrapes, inspires loyalty from all who work with him, and always gets his man.
Steel plays this like a nascent British Indiana Jones, all gung-ho spirit and
lantern-jawed heroics, a fantasy of white intervention amid the film’s
interests in the African experience.
Like Where No Vultures
Fly, the film makes strong use of its colour cinematography, although
arguably the main fantasy here is the change seen in Mary Payton. As played by
Sheila Sim, she is a glamorous figure, always in a different (and colourful)
outfit, and normally in full make-up (a departure from the hardy, bush-living
version of the character established by Dinah Sheridan). Here, Mary appears in
bottle green dresses, pink and white polka dots, scarlet red blouse, always
smart and stylish, even when pursuing her husband across the plains. Sim is not
the only colourful element here: like its predecessor, the film knows how to
foreground strong colour images – not simply the red and orange tribal outfits,
but strong blue-greens in the ocean-going scenes (and some underwater
photography), and the bright red sail on the boat Payton commandeers during his
dhow-chasing adventure.
The film ends by playing to its strengths: back in the game
reserve, with familiar wildlife images (some of which are recycled from Where No Vultures Fly, but most appear
new), as Payton and his tribal friends successfully attack the dhow, capture
the ivory smugglers and reaffirm Payton’s paternal role to the Galanas
(particularly with Ushingo dying during the attack) – as Bethlehem, the new
chief notes, Payton was right that the tribe needed to learn to walk before
they ran, and that everyone in this big country must learn to live in peace.
Payton nods, and sums up the film’s ultimate moral: patience and tolerance is
the only way forward for Africa (and, by extension, the world). Despite
Ushingo’s earlier complaint that the white man always tells the black ‘where to
live, and where not to live, what to think and what not to think,’ the film
ends with just that division.
Still, with its strong location filming, exciting narrative
pace, and the amusement value of Steel’s (dramatically increased) gung-ho
performance, there is a lot to enjoy about West
of Zanzibar.
[UPDATED April 2014: West of Zanzibar is now available as part of The Ealing Studios Rarities Collection, Volume 1, from Network]
[UPDATED April 2014: West of Zanzibar is now available as part of The Ealing Studios Rarities Collection, Volume 1, from Network]
Next time, the Great Ealing Film Challenges takes to the airwaves to discuss They Came to a City (1944)...
how can i buy this move please my e-mail abusoud51@hotmail.com
ReplyDeleteIt's sort of remarkable. Nearly 100% of the time your Ealing articles convey an impression of the film in question which is the exact opposite of my feelings about it. You loved The Titfield Thunderbolt; I found it trite and boring. You didn't like Meet Mr. Lucifer very much; I thought it was an unheralded gem. You liked this (West of Zanzibar); I lasted about 15 minutes before looking for something else to watch. We both liked The Maggie, but you insist on overreading deeper meanings into the film that are not there, where I appreciated it for what it was, a nice light comedy. De gustibus and all that, I realize, but it's a bit much, your near total off-baseness.
ReplyDeleteSorry for the delayed response.
DeleteIsn't the fact we all have different responses to films part of the fun, though? To describe my opinion of a film (or series of films)as 'total off-baseness' simply privileges your opinion over mine, when both are clearly subjective (no 'correct' reading exists).
I don't claim to offer the 'real' meaning behind these Ealing films, simply my take on them. To each their own...